Back

google.com.co Domain Breach Exposure Report

Risk Score

High Risk

Massive event volume or critical assets compromised.

AI Findings Summary

Critical

The domain google.com.co is associated with a high-risk score of 77, primarily driven by a significant volume of historical data breaches (969 events) and active infostealer logs (161 events) over the past year. The data breaches are predominantly linked to "Combolist sources," suggesting compromised credentials. Infostealer activity is led by "Redline" malware, with other notable families including "LummaC2" and "Vidar." The telemetry indicates a focus on "google.com.co" and its subdomains, with a notable concentration of activity originating from Colombia and the United States. The timeline shows a sharp increase in both employee and client-related events starting in March 2026, coinciding with a surge in data breach and infostealer activity. This exposure poses a critical risk due to the high number of data breaches and active infostealer campaigns targeting credentials associated with google.com.co. The prevalence of "Combolist sources" in leak repositories indicates a high likelihood of credential stuffing attacks against employees and clients. The observed malware families, particularly Redline, are known for their ability to exfiltrate sensitive information. Prioritization should focus on immediate credential reset campaigns for all users associated with google.com.co, enhanced monitoring for suspicious login activity, and a review of access controls. Given the nature of the targeted domain and the observed data breach types, the most relevant industry sector is Technology & SaaS.

Total Events

1,130
credential exposure events

Employee Affected Events

136
account email domain = google.com.co

Client Affected Events

994
service target = google.com.co

Free Community Account

Stop stolen credentials from logging in

Own this domain? Create a free Lunar account to see full exposure data and evidence.

12-Month Events Timeline

Event volume by breach date, employee VS client

EmployeesClients
3002001000
peak month 277
Jul 25Sep 25Nov 25Jan 26Mar 26May 26Jun 26

Infostealers VS Data Breaches

Live stealer logs VS data breaches

Infostealer logs
Events161
Share14%
Data breaches
Events969
Share86%
Infostealer logs (14%)
161events
Data breaches (86%)
969events

136 compromised employee accounts pose an infrastructure risk, while 994 leaked client credentials create regulatory liability.

Antivirus Distribution

Security Tools on Infected Endpoints

No Data Available

Malware Families Distribution

Distribution of Active Stealer Strains

Redline34
LummaC214
Vidar5
Rhadamanthys3
StealC2
Acreed1
RisePro1

Top Login URLs

Top exposed services found in the event results

  1. 1google.com.co119
  2. 2https://google.com.co100
  3. 3https://www.google.com.co/97
  4. 4google.com.co/85
  5. 5https://www.google.com.co49
  6. 6www.google.com.co/41
  7. 7https://google.com.co/login32
  8. 8www.google.com.co30
  9. 9https://google.com.co/30
  10. 10google.com.co/login23

Infostealer By Geography

Shows the distribution of Infostealer-related credential exposure events across different geographic regions. The location is determined by analyzing the metadata of the infected machines associated with each event.

Colombia
Events44
United States
Events27
China
Events5
Germany
Events5
Netherlands
Events4
Japan
Events3
South Korea
Events3
Norway
Events3

Country Breakdown

  1. 1Colombia44
  2. 2United States27
  3. 3China5
  4. 4Germany5
  5. 5Netherlands4
  6. 6Japan3
  7. 7South Korea3
  8. 8Norway3

Services Classification Distribution

Blast radius - closer to core = more critical infrastructure, size = credential volume

Git4

Operating System Distribution

Distribution of compromised endpoint builds

Windows 1145
Windows 10 Enterprise x6410
Windows 10 Pro9
C:\WINDOWS6
Windows 10 Pro x645

Leak Repository Classification

Where the exposed records currently reside

0
Named breaches
964
Combolist pools
5
Unattributed dumps

Disclaimer: This report includes AI-generated content. AI can make mistakes, so verify important findings independently before taking action.