Back

easybib.com Domain Breach Exposure Report

Risk Score

High Risk

Massive event volume or critical assets compromised.

AI Findings Summary

Critical

The domain easybib.com exhibits a high-risk score of 93, primarily driven by a significant volume of historical data breaches (84.9%) and active infostealer logs (15.1%) observed between July 2025 and June 2026. These events have impacted 120 employees and 41,857 clients, with a notable increase in employee-related events in March and April 2026. The data suggests widespread credential compromise, with malware families like Redline, LummaC2, and Rhadamanthys being prevalent, indicating potential for further unauthorized access and data exfiltration. The majority of compromised data originates from combolist sources, suggesting credential stuffing attacks against the platform and its users. The high volume of data breaches and infostealer activity, coupled with the large number of affected clients, elevates the priority for immediate remediation. Focus should be placed on strengthening authentication mechanisms, such as implementing multi-factor authentication for all users, and conducting thorough security audits to identify and patch vulnerabilities exploited by the observed malware. Proactive threat hunting and user education regarding phishing and credential security are also critical to mitigate ongoing risks.

Total Events

41,977
credential exposure events

Employee Affected Events

120
account email domain = easybib.com

Client Affected Events

41,857
service target = easybib.com

Free Community Account

Stop stolen credentials from logging in

Own this domain? Create a free Lunar account to see full exposure data and evidence.

12-Month Events Timeline

Event volume by breach date, employee VS client

EmployeesClients
12,0008,0004,0000
peak month 10,773
Jul 25Sep 25Nov 25Jan 26Mar 26May 26Jun 26

Infostealers VS Data Breaches

Live stealer logs VS data breaches

Infostealer logs
Events6,341
Share15%
Data breaches
Events35,636
Share85%
Infostealer logs (15%)
6,341events
Data breaches (85%)
35,636events

120 compromised employee accounts pose an infrastructure risk, while 41,857 leaked client credentials create regulatory liability.

Antivirus Distribution

Security Tools on Infected Endpoints

Windows Defender137
McAfee19
Windows Defender 360 Total Security.3
Malwarebytes2
Norton Security1
Reason Cybersecurity1
None1

Malware Families Distribution

Distribution of Active Stealer Strains

Redline993
LummaC2915
Rhadamanthys910
Acreed524
Vidar397
RisePro86
Millenium83
StealC79
Remus56

Top Login URLs

Top exposed services found in the event results

  1. 1https://writing.easybib.com2,402
  2. 2writing.easybib.com2,381
  3. 3https://www.easybib.com/upgrade2,279
  4. 4easybib.com2,037
  5. 5https://www.easybib.com/login1,629
  6. 6https://easybib.com1,523
  7. 7easybib.com/upgrade1,460
  8. 8https://www.easybib.com1,231
  9. 9easybib.com/login1,153
  10. 10www.easybib.com/upgrade1,032

Infostealer By Geography

Shows the distribution of Infostealer-related credential exposure events across different geographic regions. The location is determined by analyzing the metadata of the infected machines associated with each event.

United States
Events1,692
Canada
Events292
Philippines
Events208
Pakistan
Events181
Kenya
Events141
India
Events115
Egypt
Events114
Malaysia
Events68

Country Breakdown

  1. 1United States1,692
  2. 2Canada292
  3. 3Philippines208
  4. 4Pakistan181
  5. 5Kenya141
  6. 6India115
  7. 7Egypt114
  8. 8Malaysia68

Services Classification Distribution

Blast radius - closer to core = more critical infrastructure, size = credential volume

-
Total

Operating System Distribution

Distribution of compromised endpoint builds

Windows 11643
Windows 11 24H2 build 26100 (64 Bit)426
Windows 10 Home x64392
Windows 10 Enterprise x64331
Windows 10 22H2 build 19045 (64 Bit)264

Leak Repository Classification

Where the exposed records currently reside

0
Named breaches
35,606
Combolist pools
30
Unattributed dumps

Disclaimer: This report includes AI-generated content. AI can make mistakes, so verify important findings independently before taking action.